Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: DHS writes to Banks:May inspect safe deposit boxes & seize contents w/ no warrants

  1. #21

    Default

    Hopefully people have seen the ABC investigative "not-so-safe boxes"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdHLIq0qHhU

    Don't even leave any crumbs around for California

  2. #22

    Default

    No source, therefore, BS.

    (Not that the government wouldn't do this, they just wouldn't announce it I think, and either way, if they had, the guy would have provided the source)

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fledgling View Post
    Hopefully people have seen the ABC investigative "not-so-safe boxes"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdHLIq0qHhU

    Don't even leave any crumbs around for California
    No kidding. It's really getting insane. This is stuff you hear about happening in various third world countries. Property seizure has gotten to an epidemic right here in the US.
    Those who would fight monsters must take great care that they not become one themselves, and must always remember and never forget that when one looks into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you.

    Friedrich Nietzsche

  4. #24

    Default

    In all honesty, how many sources does a person need?
    After awhile, you see what they do, and proceed from there.
    When I saw the Comptroller of California on that video, all bets were off with entrusting banks and politicians.

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twindragons11 View Post
    it will be pretty funny if you buy a safe deposit box, and install a trigger mechanism that will release a poison gas once they open it.


    that will show them.........
    This isn't the first post of yours that made me think...

    You have some serious issues.

  6. #26

    Default

    This may or may not be true right now, but it could become true at any moment, without notice. Stories have been popping up for years about banks pilfering valuables from safe deposit boxes. Most owners have no recourse because they can't prove the contents of the SDB.

    An SDB is slightly safer than a candy store, but only as long as nobody wants your stuff.
    You need to learn The Attitude!
    Then go HERE for the knowledge
    to back up your attitude.

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Asaro View Post
    This isn't the first post of yours that made me think...

    You have some serious issues.
    We should change the name of the Forum to "Serious Issues" since many of us either discuss them or suffer from them, and in some cases . . . both . . . and those that come here without, usually become infected before very long. jmo

  8. #28

    Default

    I agree, and admit to having issues of my own

    But when I see someone show a pattern of taking pleasure in the harm and/or death of others it bumps it up the scale of disturbing a notch or two.

  9. #29

    Default Hmmmmmm

    I am surprised that storage facilities have not gotten into a system that would provide a secure box for small valuable items. Seems like a natural to me. I don't think insurance would be a particular problem and there is always someone on the premises. A dual lock system would provide as much protection as a bank and of course it would need some very thick walls, but I think it could be profitable.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Asaro View Post
    I agree, and admit to having issues of my own

    But when I see someone show a pattern of taking pleasure in the harm and/or death of others it bumps it up the scale of disturbing a notch or two.
    his avatar is the joker, was there ever any doubt?

    I like the old meat and cheese idea tho

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •